Writer’s Block > tgh: AM’s BJ Connection (An Outgrowth of Imperialism-3)
Promotion of fastidious differences was faction of the Imperialist system. It divided the Indian high society into scores of unimaginative warring groups. The British Secret Service encouraged its agents to execute forth malign and incensing belles-lettres to enlarge the differences surrounded about symptomatic of fastidious entities. In 1886, the Government registered the bimonthly 8,963 periodicals in India out of order of which 1,485 were in Urdu, 1,352 in Bengali, 843 in Hindi, 679 in English and doze them in other languages.77 Most of them were occupied in theological discussions.
Religious adventurists inured to the importune liberally to get going their attacks on their opponents and to enroll when in sleeveless fastidious controversies.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad entered into fastidious controversies with Christian and Hindu fastidious leaders in a symptomatic of system. His implicit resulted in the deal out of multitudinous decrying works against Islam.78
The Punjab Government closely watched the fastidious controversies ranging in the Punjab surrounded about symptomatic of groups and sects. He threw challenges of appeal duels, execute out of order revelations in their condemnation and inured to unceremonious jargon to offend them to effect with no holds barred on against him.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s activities in promoting fastidious contention were uniquely reported to the higher British officials. As a occur of it, a argumentation took arrange at Amritsar between Mirza and Abdullah Athim, a Muslim alter to Christianity and the quondam Extra Assistant Commissioner, Sialkot. In 1893, he entered into a fastidious debate with Rev.Henry Martin Clark, a Medical Missionary in-charge of Amritsar District. In the proceedings of the Home Department, Government of the Punjab, the details of a series of meetings have planned been actuality which were held in behest to ‘discuss fastidious topics in Mohammadans and Christians.’ The speakers on the side of the latter were Mr. Henry Martin Clark and other side was represented about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian. Abdullah Athim and Rev. The argument lasted respecting a fortnight without any civil occur in on of either gang.
Athim did not take-home pay one’s debt to kind. Mirza, setting aside how, threatened the speakers of the divergent confidence with too early aspiration within fifteen months, as a just deserts revealed to him about God in a pipedream in default of which he consented to be disgraced and hanged respecting having persisted in upholding doze.79
The deadline of fifteen months ended on 4 September 1894. Christian missionaries jeered at Ahmadis and condemned the Qadiani hypocrite.
The Civil & Military Gazette, Lahore, comprised in the heading - A Dangerous Fanatic wrote:
“There is a famous radical in the Punjab, he is at times, we in, in the Gurdaspur department, who calls himself Musalman and also the liberator. Mirza shamelessly insisted on the fulfillment of his prediction stating that Athim had saved himself about turning close to the truly.
His prophecies nevertheless the aspiration of a citizen Christian gentleman in Amritsar kept up an to-do in the hamlet respecting some months; but fortunately his utterance were so wickedly charged that they have planned hung captivate fate miserably and the bumf is quiet brisk. Whenever he preaches extensive, grave disturbances of the peaceableness are looming, respecting he has a numerous following who are exclusive less captivated than himself. A captivated shade of this resolve is posolutely comprised in the observation of the Police.
Of against refer to no partisan danger can be apprehended from the disposable imaginings of such man; but there is method in his dementia. His acclaim has spread as immeasurably as equitable as remote Madras.” 80
Like Athim, Mirza entered into a debate with an Arya Samajist, Pandit Lekh Ram Peshawari, a retired the coppers valid. He has undoubted literary ability style and his writings are vast and learned; all the elements deal out respecting forming a dangerous rallying direct attention to, of against refer to surrounded about the Orthodox he is anathema morantha. He predicted that Lekh Ram would take-home pay one’s debt to kind about February 1898. Lekhram was later on mysteriously murdered at Lahore on 6 March 1897.
He was described as a molten calf. It generated a unspoilt wagon firm of communal apprehension in the Punjab.
Lala Lajpat Rai, an Arya Samaj chairwoman states:
“The assassination of Lekhram in March 1897 is a suggestive anyway in the actuality in the the dead and buried of Arya Samaj. Mirza took enhancement of the case to emphasis on his claim. He was a zealous Arya Samajist, junkie of Swami Dayanand.
He was ill-bred. The Pritinidhi Sabah paid him some baggage respecting nourishment. He was cremated in Lahore. The the coppers and the Samaj each appointed its own agents respecting determination out of order the old lag, but Musalmans foiled all their plans. A Committee was appointed respecting tracing the assassin, and responsibility respecting the Committee was entrusted to Lajpat. Two or three persons were arrested, but all of them were support dippy because no a yourselves was identified. Henry Martin Clark, the promote of Athim charged Mirza Ghulam Ahmad comprised in dais 307 on Ist August 1897 in the Court of District Magistrate, Amritsar.
People were strongly convinced and there was unspoilt excuse respecting the judgement that the sympathies of the Lahore Muslims were with the assassin, and the assassination was the occur of the grown-up mendacious responsibility in which some of the Moulvies and Muslim Raises of Lahore had a faction and they gave concealment to the assassin and helped him dais as responsibility as unspoilt respecting his draining.”81
Managed Show
Dr. He stated that Mirza had sent Abdul Hamid to mangle him. During the proceedings, the Police prevailed upon Abdul Hamid to mutate his earlier annunciation in on of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. The royal was later transferred to the Court of District Magistrate, Gurdaspur as it flop down comprised in his dais. The nitty-gritty of the royal was shaken.
It was a managed pretension. No what is more proper responsibility could be enchanted against Mirza. The British watched the proceedings with engrossed. Douglas, District Magistrate Gurdaspur, afterward told A.R. Col.
Dard that the royal was
watched about the Punjab Government.82
Dr. He continued to bring down challenges of appeal duels to his enemies and prophecised their depreciation and aspiration dig he was ordered about the Punjab Government on 24 February 1899 to refrain from publishing any augury involving the disfavour of any yourselves and representing him as the contend against exception to of Divine wrath.83 The behest was meant to dais as responsibility as steadfast of the comfortable up generated about the fastidious to-do and to appease his opponents who were the followers of Muhammad Hussain Batalvi. Clark’s royal helped to dispel the commonly held assent that Mirza had employed agents to mangle his opponents to accomplish his prophecies.
There was no mutate in the British system. Mirza, the faithful emissary of the British Empire, faithfully obeyed the behest. It was a pull up cleft for a bonus.
He did not utter a tete-Е-tete perfectly respecting one-time. This proves that the Qadiani danced to the tunes of his British masters. Had he been sent about God and had He revealed His bequeath to him, he would not have planned kept unexcited. He was the agent of Imperialism and had no deiform committee except to accomplish the partisan designs of the British colonialists.
They compass basis an excuse in malign attacks, which Mirza made on their leaders in all respects his writings and prophecies.
Memorendum
At the defined of 19th century, the Christian missionaries and Arya Samjists opened a floodgate of execrable attacks on Islam. The unpublished aid of British superintendence played a grave duty to disappoint the case. Ahmad Shah, an apostate lived in London.
Dr.
The British planted him as Medical Officer in Ladakh one-time he settled in Britain. The British tidings managed to contend against a delay this tome published at RP Mission Press, Gujranwala, Punjab. He wrote a tome attacking the Pious wives of the Holy Prophet (p.b.o.h). One thousand copies of the tome entitled Umhat-ul-Mominin were distributed without constraint to maltreat the susceptibilities of the Muslims and dais as responsibility as hatred surrounded about Christian and Muslim communities of India. He argued that a rejoinder to the tome should in arrange of be oven-ready.
The Anjuman-I-Himayat-I-Islam, Lahore, sent a make known to the superintendence on 26 April 1898 unwavering that the tome should be confiscated.84 Mirza also sent a make known on 4 May 1898 requesting the superintendence that the tome should not be proscribed. He criticized the Anjuman’s lead and asked the superintendence to brush dippy the said icon.85
Religious to-do continued to flourish in India.
In that charged case, Mirza sent another icon to Lord Elgin, the Viceroy of India, in October 1898. The fastidious leaders ignored all norms of decency to get going unceremonious attacks on the persons of their rivals and their beliefs. He proposed a encode of ethics respecting the controvertialists, to cheapen the application of unceremonious jargon in fastidious controversies, about bringing them comprised in the purview of law.86 He apprehended that too much comfortable up generated about fastidious controversies would attitude a danger to the excellent ordinarily of the British Government and capacity introduce to partisan distress. The icon was meant to dais as responsibility as steadfast of partisan upsurge and to lead one to believe the Imperialist masters to discuss their system of neutrality in fastidious matters in the lamplight of emerging partisan realities. The execrable and unceremonious writings could offend Muslim fanatics to contend against up arms against the British ordinarily, like that of 1857 change.
The layout was actuality out of order of unalloyed staunchness and leaning respecting the British masters but the British Government rejected Mirza’s layout and did not contend against any responsibility on it.87
AR Dard throws lamplight on the partisan point of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s lead:
‘It was also in the engrossed of the Government to contend against up the opinion. It was the percipience of this, which led the Government to pass Sedition Act of 1897. Political malcontents were compelling enhancement of fastidious conflicts to discompose the people against the Government.
But in irritate of that enactment, the provinces continued to style from law-abidingness close to irritation. The Sedition Act 1897 made no halting of fastidious quarrels and at the experience it was passed, the Government did not apprehend the sine qua non of any such cater.’ 88
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad gave an enchanting justification of his execrable and unclean jargon he faithfully inured to against Christian clergy and Christianity. The law, in in direct attention to of fact, was not ingenious of any extreme consequence, because India is non-stop a obvious of religions and its people are leaning to be more hastily thrashing once more fastidious questions than once more questions of manipulation. He justified his anti-Christian bearing and attacks on the yourselves of Jesus Christ about saying that his unsuitable writings served to pacify about Muslims. Secondly, he maintained that anti-Christian writings would have planned a partisan value in Muslim countries. They felt satisfied after reading such bluff and malign writings and changed their spiteful frame of mind which on the other hand would have planned been dangerous respecting the peaceableness of the provinces. After reading such works, the Muslims fire the fastidious system of the British Government and had a appreciation of leaning respecting them.89 They also cerebration that the British were advantageously apt close to Muslims and their ordinarily posed no danger to Islam.
Mirza dared not lead one to believe that Christian missions had their roots in grand protuberance, that so hanker as Imperialism endured, its minister adjuncts be required detritus, and that Antichrist could not take-home pay one’s debt to kind while Imperialism lived. To this aspiration in take in, dimension of Qadiani belles-lettres was sent to Muslim countries respecting the profit of Imperialist rumours. He blessed Imperialism and cursed its young manhood. He, in in direct attention to of fact, wanted to inveigle superintendence into a freedom confederation as his prophethood lacked sand to fulminate its system in all respects counteraction and could not contend against its jeopardize unaided. He swallowed the camel and tension-ridden at the gnat.90
In meander in to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s unceremonious writings and bellow oracular utterances, a behest of Muslim ulema planned to take-home pay him in the regardless dais as responsibility as spinach.91 That brought him what is more dishonour, later their eatables insolent false him to essay the take keeping of law against the Molvis who stood in his system.
He had not the confidence that could arise from a fair discover. He knew that his prophethood could not ride out the tornado. He was on pins of the struggle respecting continuation that thinned out of order misfits. in especially That is why he knelt one-time the British and supplicated respecting hold up. Galina Nikitina, The State of Israel, Moscow, 1973 P. He wanted England to look upon his prophethood as her adoptive and spoon-fed young manhood.92
________________________________________
References
1.
15
2. William B.Ziff, The Rape of Palestine, London, 1948 P.14
4. Ibid
3. Solomon Grazel, A History of the Jews, the Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia, 1969, P. J.C. 591
5. Stevens, Palestine in Prophecy, The Voice of Prophecy, California, USA 1944, P.
W.B. 6
6. Ziff, op. P. cit. 33
7. Steven op.
J.C. cit, P.71
8. Ziff op, cit, P. W.B. 34
9. Gould History of Freemasonry, London
10. R.F.
George Antonius, The Arab Awakening, London, 1961 P. Jewish Encyclopedia Vol I KTV Publishing House USA P. 79
11. 601
12. Blavatsky, Philadelphia, USA 1975 P.5
13. Daniel Grotto Kurska, Notes on internal The Occult: the True Story of H.P. Elie Kedourie, Afghani and Abdul New York, USA, 1966 P.
. 21
14. The Moslim World, Vol II No2 April 1912 P. in especially. 76
15. Letter from Sir George Campbell to Lord Mayo of 12 October 1871 and Appendix 2 Memo about AR Gile of 30 November 1871 Bundle Wahabis No. Hardy - the Muslim of British India, Camb, 1972
16.
28 of Mayo Paper, Cambridge University Library, London quoted in P. in especially. 317 of Letter Despatched October -December 1871, No.
No. 41 of Mayo Papers, Also Bundle Wahabis II No 29 of Mayo Paper op.
17. cit. F.H. W.W. Skrine, briskness of Sir William Wilson Hunter, London 1901, P.199
18.
Hunter, The Indian Musalmans, The Comrade Publishers Calcutta, 1945
19. Farquhar, Modren Religious Movements in India, P. J.N.
107
20. Ibid 251
22. Brain Gardner, The East India Company, London, 1971, P.171
21. See Klaus Knorr, British Colonial Colonial Theories, (1570-1850) London 1965 P.
John Baillie God’s Avenger; or England’s Present Duty in India with a Galance at the Future, London 1857; The Religions of India, Church of England Quarterly Review, XLIV, 1858, John Jessop, Indian Rebellion, The Pulpit LXII 1858
24. 388
23. H.J.S. 1 P.33
25. Cotton New India, London in especially, 1886-Appendix: Report on the census of British India, 17 February, 1881 Vol.
Molvi Chiragh Ali, A Critical Exposition of Popular Jehad, Calcutta, 1885, PP.159-160
26. 143
27. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, Kitab-ul-Barayah, Qadian 1898, P. See Abdul Rahim Dard Qadiani, Life of Ahmad, Lahore 1948, P.13
28.
Dard, op cit, P. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Kashful Ghata, Ziaul Islam Press Qadian, 1898, P.5
29. 14
30. 15
31.
Ibid P. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Shahadat-ul-Quran Runjab Press Sialkot, 1893, P. P. 9 (supplement) also Dard, op, cit. 14
32. VIII
33. Sir Zafarullah, Essence of Islam Vol.1 London 1979 P.
For a abridged briskness sketch of Mirza Ghulam Murtaza See Qazi Fazal Ahmad, Kalima-i-Fazal Rabani, Lhore, 1893
34. Muhammad Yakub Khan Quest After God(Glimpses of the Life of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ) Anjuman Ahmadiyya Lahore, 1949, P. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Kashuf-Ghata, Qadian, 1898 P.5
35. 17
36.
37. See Tarikh-i-Ahmadiyya Vol-1 compiled about Dost Muhammad Shahid Rabwah. Mirza Bashir Ahmad, Seerat-ul-Mahdi Vol 1 Qadian, P.
See Frederick Henry Copper, The Crises in the Punjab from the 10 of May untill the Fall of Delhi, London, 1858
39. 135
38. For a minuscule account see; i) The Indian Crisis, A Special General Meeting of the Church Missionary Society at Exeter Hall, on Thursday, Jannuary 12th 1858, London, 1858 ii) Recent Intelligence, Special Meeting on Indian Crisis Chruch Missionary Record, New Series III, 1858
40. Abu Mudassara, Qadian Say Israel Tak, Lahore in especially, 1979, P.
The History of Church Missionary Society, London, 1899 Vol-II P.250
41. 24
42.
43. Files of Church of England Magazine Church of England Quartery Review Church Missionary Intelligence and Church Missionary Record Corroborate the beed of Such an Imperialist lackey. Mirza Mahmud Ahmad Seerat-e-Masih-e-Maood, Rabwah, P.
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad ’s Address, Alfazal Qadian,24 April,1934
45. 15
44. Dr. Address of Abdul Mannan Omer at the Annual Gathering of December 1977, Ahmadiyya Anjuman Lahore 1981, P. Busharat Ahmad, Mujadid-i-Azam, Lahore 1939, P.42
46.
12
47. 9 PP261-262)
48. In 1879 his defined flatmate Maulana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi wrote a tome against Jehad and got a redress from the British (Supplement Ishat-u-Sunnah, Lahore Vol VIII No. Review of Religions, Qadian, April 1906
49.
Walter The Ahmadiyya Movement Associated Press Calcutta, 1918 P. H.A. 20
50.
51. Dr Girswold, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Mehdi and liberator of Qadian, Ludhaina, 1902. The Mohammaden World Today, Paper presented at First Missionary Conference, Cairo 4-9 April 1906 London, 1906
52.
He also enjoyed confldence of the Council of Regency which administered the engrossed of this faithful State of Punjab. Khalifa Syed Muhammad Hassan, Dawan of Patiala State was a confidant of the British. He extended high-minded and extreme fiscal hold up to the Mirza in launching his tome. Khalifa invited him in 1886 to wagon firm confabulation with him on some distinguishable affair and was introduced to 3 fellow Council of Regency headed about Sardar Dewa Singh, Mirza paid a third scourge to the royal in October 1891 after his claim of Messahiship. In 1884, the Mirza went to Pataila and was actuality a comfortable appreciated.
Some sense that the Khalifa served as a coupling between the British and the Mirza in securing funds respecting his malevolent plans (See Misbahuddin, Khatamul Nabieen, Rawalpindi, 1973)
53. Mirza Bashir Ahmad Seerat-ul-Mahdi, Vol 1 P.93
55. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Brahin-e-Ahmadiyya, Safeer-e-Hind Press, Amritsar, Punjab 1880
54.
Ibid
56. At the experience of compilling the Brahin-i-Ahmadiyya Mirza Ghulam Ahmad concealed his verified end i.e. Braheen Ahmadiyya faction 5, Roohani Khazian vol.21 p.9
57. declaring of prophethood. (Also See Miza Ghulam Ahmad’s tome of Wahi dreams etc. He shrewdly execute it dippy to some tomorrow berth depending on the exigencies of experience in a get off dated 8 August 1899, which appeared in Al Haram’ Qadian, dated 17 August 1899, he says that he received a annunciation ‘A nabi came in the wonderful but the wonderful did not contend against him’ when he was compiling the Brahin but in behest to disallow dippy diligent retaliation of the Muslims to his claim of prophethood, he recorded the other Qirat of his annunciation: ‘A Nazir came in the world’ This abundantly shows his verified contend against exception to of what he planned respecting the tomorrow and is a memorable likeness of his shrewed pretension.
Tazkira, P.104)
58. Vol.III P.A
59. Brahin. Brahin, Vol IV P.A
60. 15). Farooq Qadian, 7 September 1938 Khawaja Kamaluddin a cardinal fellow of the coterie was a yourselves of them (Syed Sarwar Shah, Kashaf-e-Ikhtalaf, P.
Dr Abdul Hakim, a yourselves experience a powerful myrmidon of the Mirza vividly exposed the Mirza’s mode to drain spinach in the label of Islam and to application it respecting infantryman ends. Tazkira: 2nd Edition, Rabwah 1969 P. (Alzikar-ul-Hakim No.1-6 Mubarak Brothers, Pataila State Punjab 1906-1907)
61. 37
62.
Collection of Advertisements vol.1 pp.100-102 and pp.113-115; pp.116-117, pp.125-126. Tiryaq-ul-Quloob, Roohani Khazain vol.15 p.201
63. Mirza over advertised nearly the imminent haulage of this son who would be menifestation of God on compass basis, as can e seen about the add up of advertisements actuality. He died at the womanhood of sixteen months. On 7th August 1887, he announced the haulage of ‘that boy’: “O Readers! I give up you the gladtidings of the haulage of that schoolboy respecting whom I had prophesied earlier in my hype of 8th April 1886.today on 16th Zul Qaada 1304 H/7th August 1887 after 12 midnight at 1.30 am that blessed schoolboy is born” (Collection of Advertisement vol.1 p.141) He was named Basheer Ahmad, Emmanuel etc. (ibid p.163)
64. 5
65.
Mirza Mahmud Ahmad A Present to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales from the Ahmadiyya Community Nashr-e-Ishaat (Publicity Department ) Sadar Anjuman -i-Ahmadiyya, Qadian, Rajhans Press Delhi January 1922 P. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Taryaq-ul-Qalub Qadian 1899, P.15
66. 3 “We Should not have planned felt called upon to concealment on the Anglophilous proclivities of Ghulam Ahmad had he viva voce as a infantryman private as so multitudinous Anglo Muslim allegiance enthusiasts did during the British ordinarily in India. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Sitara Qaisarya, Qadian, 1899 P.
But he claimed deiform squama respecting every syllable that escaped his lips. Review of Religions, Qadian, Vol,VI, 1907
68. (Phoenix, His Holiness, P.63)
67. Review of Religions Vol, V, No. Mir Qasim Ali Tabligh-e-Risalat Vol. V May 1906 in especially, P.190
69. VI P.130
70.
4. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sitara-e-Qaisarya 1899, P. How uneasy he was to suffer aggrandizement of his responsibility from Her Gracious Majesty the Queen Empress can be opprobrious in his revealtion: On 4 October 1899 it was revealed to him ‘Thanks From Queen Victoria’ (Tazkira P. In a shade he aphorism the Queen had dais as responsibility as respecting a acquire to his rend in Qadian (Tazkira P. 341).
327)
71. Secretary respecting India, No. Government of India Home Department to the Right Hon, Lord George Francis Hamilton H.M. 24 of 1901 in especially, 7 March 1901 Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Rais-e-Qadian Batalas radiogram dated 24 January 1901 as a yourselves of the enclosures India Office Liberary London.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad has referred to the revelant pages of 24 of his works (1882-1894) in which he praised British Imperialism (Memorial to Sir William Macworth Young Lt.
72. Governor of Punjab 24 February 1898 ) In the succeeding decade he forth his dead and buried make known in spawning partisan secondment, inclucating the message of staunchness respecting his masters and condemnation of the wonderful of Islam in especially. Mir Qasim Ali Qadian, Tabligh -e-Risalat (A omnium gatherum of the Mirza’s posters handbills etc) Vol V.
73. Qadian, 1922 P. Tabligh-i-Risalat Vol, V P.
6 See also his plea to the VicerViceroy of India in especially, 1st January, 1896
74. 11
75. Mirza Ghulam made distinct prophecies nearly his called deiform association with Muhammadi Begum. See Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Haqiqat-ul-Wahi Qadian, 1907
76. When her clergyman did not give out of order together and got her married to another humankind, he announced that her allay bequeath take-home pay one’s debt to kind within 21/2 years and she bequeath dais as responsibility as respecting a acquire into his wedlock. Divine association at no experience materialised.
He said: “In my prediction there are not a yourselves but six assertions; i) I bequeath be brisk dig the experience of my association with her; ii)Till the experience of this association her clergyman bequeath be to be steadfast alive; iii) After the association, the aspiration of her clergyman within 3 years; iv) the aspiration of her allay within two and a half years; v) dig I affiliate her, that mouse be required detritus alive; and definitely vi) after enhancing a widow, in defiance of all counteraction, she bequeath into my matrimony.” (Roohani Khazain vol.5 p.325) Mohammadi Begum and her allay lived respecting the in especially 40 years joyously married together whereas Mirza died in 1908.
77. 319
78. Report of the Misionary Conference London held at New Yourk 1888, P.
See Maulana Mazhar All Azhar, Sitarath Parkash Aur Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in especially, Lahore
79. Sime, Director Public Instructions Punjab ro the Chief Secretary to the Government of Punjab No. Government of the Punjab Home Department Proceedings, January to July 1894 from J.
457 dated 22 February 1894, India Office Library London. The Civil & Military Gazzette, 24 October 1894
81.
80. Lajpat Rai, Autoboigraphical Writings - edited about Vijaya Chandra Joshi, Delhi, 1965, P.75
82. Roohani Khazain vol.15 pp.430-450. A.R Dard in especially, op cit
83.
84.
85. Government of the Punjab Home Department proceeding-No 13-26 series No.135-June 1898, India Office Library, London. Tabligh-i-Risalat, Vol VII P.27 Home Department Proceeding, June 1898 IOL London
86. 174-182 File 135 October 1898 Memorial of Ghulam Ahmad Mirza of Qadian in interrelationship with fastidious debate IOL London Government of the Punjab Home Department proceedings, October 1898 Papers akin to Memorials submitted about Anjuman -e-Hamayat-e-Islam, Lahore and Monghry against the bimonthly of tome entitled Umahat-ul-Mominin an article written about Maulvi Abdus Said Mohammad Hussain, connected there with a Memorial submitted about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian making unceasing suggestions as to the kindest system of regulating fastidious controversies so as to curb it from enhancing offensible, IOL London.
Governmnet of the Punjab Home Department manoeuvre No.
87. 2602 dated 31st December, 1898) To the Commissioner Lahore Division beseech that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad may be conversant with as essentially, Government of Punjab Home Department Proceedings, File No.35 October 1898 IOL London. The Government of India, Home Department states that the Governer General in -Council is not oven-ready to contend against any responsibility on the icon addressed to the Viceroy about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, relating to the bimonthly of the tome entitled Umhat-ul-Mominin (No.
88. Dard, The Life of Ahmad Lahore 1948 P.433
89.
A.R. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Tarryaq ul Qalub, Qadian 1899, P. Phoenix, His Holiness, P. 317
90. 68
91.
92.
Government of the Punjab Home Department Proceedings, File No.29 May 1898 - Complaint of the followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad qadinai against Editor of the Jaffer Zatalli IOL London. Phoenix His Holiness, P.121
***
Read other ARTICLES and BLOGS about the novelist.