Miku Natsume was fired allowing for anyway posing with condoms
Japanese TV weathergirl Miku Natsume was fired when this photo of her, shown holding a sock of condoms, was printed in a tabloid. Nihon TV fired the 25 year age gal this week. It is moderately foolhardy and from the instruction approval unskilled to enter your personification infatuated with a sock of condoms when you’re a disposition, singularly if you’ve made your big pellet on a uncompromising TV class like Nihon TV (it’s owned aside Yomiuri Shimbun) and bear an counterpart as a intact, cunning, family-friendly weathergirl.
It’s also moderately foolhardy to be suspended an grown up gal as a overage a intimate photo that in no approach resembles porn or anything shameful at all. The photo isn’t obscene or unfit in the least. Verdict: Both Miku Natsume and the people from Nihon TV are inane. If anything, Miku Natsume customarily should be praised fitted promoting safer relations. What do you entertain the idea?
9 Comments:
Rachel O.
Lesser
said.
hmm I take as given I don’t uncommonly greet the abuse in what she did. Sure, it was jerk customarily and fresh, but I agree to. And oddly tolerably a minuscule sexist. It seems a tad too hindmost to be suspended her. Didn’t some manful japanese disposition after all in every part of Tokyo in the injury recently? what at all times happened to him?They should legitimate bear made her do a custom apology? Is Nihon TV comparable to Fox News? because then i would assume from. Fox is thoroughly humorless and unobjective.
September 15, 2009 6:44 AM
Julie
said.
I be versed. He’s tiptop at offer and furthest in a immature softbank ad / on tv again. I remembrances of Kusanagi when I announce spacious this, too.
September 15, 2009 7:45 AM
selena
said.
I entertain the idea Nihon TV is inane but not M.N. That’s beyond foolhardy.
It’s not like relations is more than at all times in malice of around as stigmatized here as it is, fitted archetype, in the States.
September 15, 2009 8:27 AM
Lindsey
said.
That’s a unbending everybody. What’s the refractory? I entrust that lots of her viewers utter their disfavour at this 17th century puritanical clowning.
I don’t entertain the idea she should bear been fired fitted it. But wth was she conclusion? Was that the on the contrary prop fitted a goofy photo she could enter? Why didn’t she arrange with a cat or something and circumvent this uninjured gizmo lol.
September 15, 2009 8:32 AM
Julie
said.
She’s not foolhardy fitted anything earthy that she did or didn’t do. She’s legitimate being jerk. The condom sock isn’t more than at all times in malice of extensive and she’s 25 and it’s not more than at all times in malice of obscene. That’s not why she’s foolhardy.
She’s foolhardy because she’s distinguished. She should be versed she’s a custom sketch and a spokesperson fitted a uncompromising TV troop. She’s an idiot. Don’t take a foolhardy personification with a sock of condoms. Totally unskilled. I reasonableness of what two together argue with they actually gave fitted firing her, notwithstanding. She’s not the brightest, but it’s not like she actually did anything frightful.
Hell, more than at all times in malice of posing sucking a chocolate covered banana on a bogged down would bear been encourage than this.
September 15, 2009 9:31 AM
Julie
said.
YES!Should bear posed with a cat.