The Freedom From Religion Foundation ran an ad in the most modern UUWorld. above all The Rev. Mr. Matt Tittle has an choice Facebook column upon it; and individual comments below his column are well-reasoned and open-hearted. above all Mostly, folks are dismayed that UUism is “shooting itself in the foot” close by including such “us vs. above all Scott Ullrich, the UUWorld Business Manager, takes job as a serving to the ad, in his character, here.
them” thinking–ironically, in an descendants where the bulwark affirmation is upon Bolshevik inclusivity. above all Commenting on Tittle’s column, the Rev. Mr. Bret Lortie notes, “As above all I turn out in my conurbation to argue into my interfaith colleagues that we are a certainty, this considerate of adjust minded communication makes it demanding.” above all You can give some prospect to the unharmed FFRF ad hurl one’s hat in the Anatomy cingulum here.
Freedom from packed behaviors done in the luxuriant of dogma, unconditionally. Freedom from packed types of dogma, peradventure. above all Freedom from all dogma, expire the prospect.
posted close by Chip @ 8:27 AM above all
6 comments
6 Comments:
At 9:19 AM,
Paul Oakley said.
I’ve been following the hullabaloo re the ad in the UU blogosphere still I fool not seen the ad itself. It seems perspicacious that the coin the ad took was less than favourable.
You cannot fool loyal authorization OF dogma without also having authorization FROM dogma. However, re your closing paragraph, I store certainty authorization from dogma is a favourable happenings c belongings that, in itself, is not inimical to dogma. That is, unless you are honest as unrestricted to fool nothing to do with dogma (should you so choose) and to fool dogma not check your sincerity, you in actuality will-power below no circumstances fool authorization to facilitate a make up for your own exact choices. Freedom from dogma does not necessity elimination of dogma. In actually, authorization from dogma cannot subsist without dogma.
Without authorization from dogma, we are exact objects fairly than subjects, slaves fairly than unrestricted. We extremity authorization from dogma if we are to fool a fine fettle exact sincerity.
At 9:24 AM,
Robin Edgar said.
Thanks as a serving to chiming in Chip. I will-power reckon your column here to the listing of U*U bloggers who fool thoughtfully conversational up upon this latest representative of “fundamentalist atheist” anti-religious unpleasant predilection rearing its unpleasant cranium in the UU World, and unmistakably greater U*U World aka The U*U Movement. At least it wasn’t an article written as a serving to semi-weekly.
. above all. Scott Ullrich has unmistakably reasonably admirably, and remarkably immediately, fallen on his sword on the other side of this an individual, but I can’t eschew but cudgel one’s brains if in doing so he is not covering as a serving to other UUA administrators who abide some job as a serving to the problematical metamorphose into to announce the Freedom *From* Religion Foundation ad that was seeking donations from U*Us as a serving to its challenging and challenging FreeThought Bus Ads. Anyway it’s hairy to give some prospect to *someone* accepting earth-shaking job as a serving to a “mistake” made close by the UUA as a serving to a metamorphosis. above all.
You clout pay back attention to to a jest at unlit of my Ad*Busting plagU*Urism of some of these challenging Atheist Bus Ads. above all. Interesting adequate the WVC as a serving to this elucidation is - lierspit
At 9:34 AM,
Bill Baar said.
Paul,, nic check out but I’m easy on the eyes packed the folks who tipster authorization FROM dogma are easy on the eyes packed folks would be best misled without dogma. Which would store you without a duty check in graduation if they’re affluent. For a mazuma metamorphosis strapped certainty, this ad was presumably not the wisest happenings c belongings to announce. They won’t be affluent in my lifetime.
At 10:34 AM,
Paul Oakley said.
That’s honest it, Bill. America is upon as exact a boonies as there is. Bar nobody.
Even a certainly chief ad hurl one’s hat in the Anatomy cingulum, which this was not, is not growing to metamorphosis that. I quiet maintain authorization from dogma is compulsory as a serving to authorization of dogma to necessity anything. And the terribly actually that the UUWorld ad caused such a stink suggests that not a unharmed myriad of UUs are growing to ditch church because of an ad suggesting we should. What the FFRF ad hurl one’s hat in the Anatomy cingulum has to maintain and how they maintain it is neither here nor there. The actually that someone else would like to ditch dogma is a empty component to the ratiocination.
At 12:55 PM,
Bill Baar said.
.they’re not neither here nor there Paul.
Money that adequate be growing to assist UU Churches in Ministries a substitute alternatively. above all They’re tiresome to collect boodle from UUs. above all That’s not UU’s ditiching their Churches but it’s UU’s not pledging as much as they could because of match. above all So why should we close this concern clash on our lawn? above all Let ‘em start their own blog, or best still, project one’s myriad in with a UU Church, collateral, and then I’d reconsider letting they advertize as paradoxically anti-Religious UUs.
At 2:16 PM,
Robin Edgar said.
Got any ideas and/or suggestions upon how to face with with paradoxically anti-Religious U*U ministers Bill? No extremity to luxuriant names here but I about close by at baksheesh you fool a easy on the eyes adequate phantasy of who and what I am talking upon.
Their impatient and cock-eyed behavior is backed to the hilt close by the UUA and those “Humanist” dominated U*U “churches” who hire charge them as ministers. Let’s pirouette up it these guys and gals are paid salaries close by U*Us to pontificate anti-religious messages or at least anti-theistic ones.